DO HARD TIMES YIELD BAD ETHICS?
By
Martin A. Cole, Director
Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
Reprinted
from Bench & Bar of Minnesota (July
2009)
There
are few things that liberals and conservatives seem to agree on any more, but
one of the few is that the economy has been down for a while now. Why that is so or whether it’s someone’s fault
remain issues about which to disagree, but that times are bad is accepted. What does a poorly performing economy mean for
the legal profession, and more particularly for the ethical standards of the
profession? Does a bad economy result in
a similar downturn in ethical standards; i.e.,
does a bad economy equal bad ethics?
Layoffs, Going
Solo
Several aspects of the
legal profession are immediately affected by tough economic times. Firms start cutting salaries and laying off
employees, including attorneys. Some of
the largest firms in the state have already done so. Where do laid-off lawyers go? And what happens to those who remain behind? Well, perhaps some of the top young talent
from big firms will wind up at mid-size to small firms, unless those firms too
are laying off or at least not hiring. Those
hired may only replace some attorneys at those firms. Some of the laid-off will by necessity become
solos, permanently or at least until they find different employment. Likewise, for newly admitted attorneys, the
job market is currently pretty grim, since while a few may be hired to replace
more experienced attorneys at a lower cost to a firm, it is just as likely that
they too will have to “hang out a shingle,” at least temporarily. Those who remain behind likely face stresses
of their own due to longer hours and heavier workloads.
Though some marketers
can argue that a recession is a “perfect” time to commence a solo practice, I’m
not convinced that that’s true for the majority of the people who find
themselves opening a new practice, especially if it’s not an entrepreneurial
choice. Now, an increase in solo
practitioners does not
necessarily indicate any lowering of the ethical standards, but since many of
these new solos are not there totally by choice and many are used to practicing
in a firm with solid support staff assistance, the possibility of inadvertent
error or even shortcuts does exist. So
also attorneys remaining in downsized firms face similar challenges. Many of these lawyers will feel compelled to
enter into areas of practice with which they are not familiar, or take on
questionable clients or cases simply because an advance fee is available.
Although bills have to
be paid, taking a case that you are not competent to handle is not the answer. Nor is rationalizing conflict-of-interest
decisions so that you may accept an otherwise prohibited representation. Rather, hard work, effective marketing,
networking skills and mutual support are essential in these times to build a
practice; also get input on how to manage a law business properly. Put the phone numbers for the Director’s
Office—to call for an advisory opinion—and for your malpractice carrier—to get
timely advice on potential risks—on speed dial!
Bankruptcy
Economic downturns
also result in an increase in bankruptcy filings, meaning extra work for one
segment of the bar, but also that more lawyers themselves may seek to file
bankruptcy. There has long been some
confusion about an attorney’s ability to file personal bankruptcy under either
Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. It is not unethical for an attorney to file
bankruptcy; indeed, an attorney has the same right as any person to file
bankruptcy. A bankruptcy trustee could
not realistically sell a law practice, so a lawyer in bankruptcy may certainly
continue to practice, although the physical assets of the lawyer’s office may
be subject to sale. Ethical issues can
arise in bankruptcy, however. For while
filing bankruptcy is not an ethical issue per
se, fraud or dishonesty committed in connection with a bankruptcy
petition can be and has been.
“Borrowing”
From a lawyer
discipline perspective, the fear during a recession is that bad times can bring
out the worst in some people. Obviously
the most serious concern in economic bad times is that an attorney may turn to
clients’ funds as a source of “extra income.” “Borrowing” client funds, no matter whether
the attorney intends to repay the money, is misappropriation that will result
in substantial discipline and possibly criminal prosecution. Attorneys working in lawyer discipline have
long had an intuitive sense that misappropriation of client funds increases
during economic tough times, but this belief is supported principally by
anecdotal evidence. In part that is so
because the conduct often does not immediately come to light, perhaps not until
after the economy begins to recover. Thus,
tying the two together is not always clear. Vigilance against the temptation to “borrow”
must come from within, especially if there are not trust account safeguards in
place in your practice.
Commingling of
personal funds in a lawyer’s trust account also has the potential to increase
in economic bad times. Hiding funds from
creditors by placing them in a fiduciary account puts legitimate client funds
at risk and also can subject an attorney to substantial discipline.
Depression
Finally, depression is
a very real possibility during economic hard times, and not just the
deeper-level-of-economic-problems kind of depression. If lawyers, as regularly reported, are indeed
up to six times
more likely than the general population to suffer from depression even in the
best of times, how much more likely to occur are depression or other
psychological problems resulting from the stress of layoffs, declining salaries
or revenues, or longer hours? Certainly
alcohol and drug abuse issues can increase as well. Here, vigilance must be taken not only as to
our ethics, but as to the well-being of ourselves and our fellow lawyers as well.
Ultimately, no
recession or even a depression will last forever; economic recovery will occur.
Losing your ethical compass due to hard
times, however, can have an impact that lasts forever.