Three Ways to Avoiding Complaints
by
Megan Prebelich, Assistant Director
Minnesota Office of Lawyers Professional
Responsibility
Reprinted
from Minnesota Lawyer (October 5,
2009)
Since starting my position as an assistant director
with the Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility in December 2007, one of
my tasks has been to review the complaints that come in each day to determine
whether they should be investigated.
Based upon this experience, here are three things that I’ve learned that
I didn’t fully appreciate previously.
One thing that has surprised me is the number of
problems between attorneys and clients that stem from basic communication
issues. Good communication is a key
element in representing a client effectively.
Rule 1.4(a)(3) of the Minnesota Rules of Professional
Conduct is an important section that is often glossed over by attorneys. It states that “[a] lawyer shall keep the
client reasonably informed about the status of the matter.”
Attorneys should know to inform a client when a vital
document or letter is received about the client’s case or to promptly respond
to specific requests for information from a client. Keeping the client “reasonably informed about
the status of the matter” may seem slightly vague, however. “Reasonable” means different things to
different people, and, as evidenced by the complaints this office receives from
clients, the meaning can be viewed very differently by the attorney and the
client.
To clients, even if nothing is currently going on with
their cases, not hearing from their attorney for a month or two can be
tremendously stressful. Attorneys, on
the other hand, may be trying to keep the costs down for their clients, which
is an admirable aspiration. But good
communication should not be the item that is trimmed. It is very valuable for a law office to
develop a cost-effective system for sending out occasional status updates to
clients.
A second thing that has surprised me is that many
attorneys fail to have their clients sign retainer agreements.
At the beginning of most attorney-client
relationships, everything usually goes smoothly. But as most attorneys know, problems can
arise. Oftentimes, not having a written
retainer agreement that outlines the scope of representation and the billing
policies and procedures only exacerbates an already complicated attorney-client
relationship.
By having clients sign a written retainer agreement at
the very beginning of the relationship, lawyers are potentially saving several
headaches down the road. Plus, the
retainer agreement can be a starting point for an invaluable discussion between
the lawyer and the client about what is expected of both parties signing the
agreement.
Lastly, too many attorneys facing discipline comment that
the matter that gave rise to the complaint “was a real problem from the
beginning” or that they “had doubts about taking on this client.”
Indeed, these are often the cases that lead to
discipline. Although these are trying
economic times, if these thoughts come into your head when considering
undertaking representation for a client, think carefully about whether you have
the experience necessary for the representation, the time to work on this file
or the desire to work on this case or with this client. Thinking twice about accepting a case may
save you time and headaches later and avoid a complaint with this Office.
During the past 22 months I have learned that the vast
majority of Minnesota’s attorneys are doing a wonderful job representing their
clients. These few simple suggestions
are intended only to improve that percentage.