MEMORANDUM
FROM: Cassie Hanson
Assistant Director
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
RE: TRUST ACCOUNT OVERDRAFT NOTIFICATION AGREEMENT
Rule 1.15, Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC), is the rule pertaining to lawyer trust accounts. Among other things, it requires lawyers to maintain their client trust accounts only in financial institutions that have signed an agreement to report to this Office “in the event any properly payable instrument is presented against a lawyer trust account containing insufficient funds, irrespective of whether or not the instrument is honored.”
On December 21, 2006, the Minnesota Supreme Court ordered revisions to Rule 1.15, MRPC, to take effect on July 1, 2007. Among the revisions ordered by the Court was the inclusion of a requirement that financial institutions, as an additional condition for approval to maintain lawyer trust accounts, agree to pay a certain minimum level of interest on its Interest on Lawyer Trust Account (“IOLTA”) accounts, i.e., the lawyer trust accounts on which interest is remitted to the Lawyer Trust Account Board. Specifically, Rule 1.15(o), MRPC, now requires the following:
An approved eligible financial institution must pay no less on IOLTA accounts than (i) the highest earnings rate generally available from the institution to its non-IOLTA customers on each IOLTA account that meets the same minimum balance or other eligibility qualifications, or (ii) 80% of the Federal Funds Target Rate on all its IOLTA accounts. The rate to be paid shall be fixed on the first day of each month, subject to rate changes during the month reflected in normal month-end calculations.
Revised Rule 1.15, MRPC, also includes a definition of “allowable reasonable fees” that approved financial institutions may charge to IOLTA accounts and a limitation of the source for payment of those fees to the interest earned on the individual IOLTA account, as follows:
‘Allowable reasonable fees’ for IOLTA accounts are per check charges, per deposit charges, sweep fees and similar charges assessed against comparable accounts by the eligible financial institution. All other fees are the responsibility of, and may be charged to, the lawyer maintaining the IOLTA account. Fees or charges in excess of the earnings accrued on the account for any month or quarter shall not be taken from earnings accrued on other IOLTA accounts or from the principal of the account. Eligible financial institutions may elect to waive any or all fees on IOLTA accounts.
Various explanatory materials to help you understand and comply with all of the above requirements are attached.
To be approved as an institution in which attorney trust accounts may be maintained, your institution must complete and sign the enclosed Trust Account Overdraft Notification and Interest on Lawyer Trust Account (“IOLTA”) Comparability Agreement and return the original to:
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
A list of approved institutions appears at this Office’s Internet website www.courts.state.mn.us/lprb.
If you have any questions regarding the reporting of overdrafts on lawyer trust accounts, please call the Director’s Office at (651) 296-3952 or (out-state) 1-800-657-3601, and ask for Cassie Hanson or Lynda Nelson. If you have any questions regarding IOLTA account comparability, please call Judy Rehak, Senior Legal Counsel, State Court Administrator’s Office, at 651-297-7800.
OVERDRAFT NOTIFICATION
IMPLEMENTATION GUIDELINES
FOR
FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS
The financial institution should send all trust account overdraft notices to:
Office of Lawyers Professional Responsibility
No. The rule applies to all interest bearing
lawyer trust accounts, such as IOLTA accounts, separate trust accounts for
particular clients, or pooled accounts with sub-accounting. Identification of accounts to which the rule
applies may be difficult since
Yes. The rule requires reporting whether or not the financial institution honors the instrument. Rule 1.15(l). It is improper for a lawyer to have overdraft privileges or any other arrangement for a personal loan to cover a trust account. Rule 1.15(a).
No. If an instrument is dishonored a copy of the notice of dishonor customarily sent to the depositor is sufficient. Rule 1.15(l)(2) sets out a list of specific items to be furnished to the Director when an instrument is presented against insufficient funds but is paid by the financial institution.
Yes, all overdrafts must be reported, irrespective of the cause. If the financial institution learns that its own error caused the overdraft, it should provide the lawyer with a written explanation that the lawyer can submit to the Director. As soon as the Director receives the overdraft notice, the attorney will be requested to explain. Any explanation from the bank will be helpful.
Yes. The rule does not preclude the financial institution from charging a lawyer or law firm the reasonable cost of producing the notice. Rule 1.15(n). Charging fees is a matter of contract between the institution and the depositor.
No. Only properly payable instruments under U.C.C. 4-401 need be reported. Rule 1.15(k). A check that lacks a signature, for example, is not properly payable.
Banks, savings and loan associations, savings banks, and any other business or person that accepts for deposit funds held in trust by lawyers. Rule 1.15(o).
Occasional negligence in failing to report to the Director will not cause removal from the list of approved institutions. However, a pattern of neglect or bad faith in not complying with the rule may cause the Director to revoke approval.
IOLTA Program Changes:
Information for
On December 21, 2006, the Minnesota Supreme Court issued amendments to the IOLTA rule which primarily update the interest or dividend rate provisions under Rule 1.15 of the Minnesota Rules of Professional Conduct to allow higher rate products for qualifying IOLTA accounts. The amendment provides that the financial institution pay (i)no less on IOLTA accounts than the highest earnings rate generally available from the institution to its non-IOLTA customers on each IOLTA account that meets the same minimum balance or other eligibility qualifications or (ii) 80% of the Federal Funds Target Rate on all of its IOLTA accounts. Financial institutions do not have to create new products if the higher rate products are not already available to their other customers. A number of IOLTA programs in other states have similar rate parity provisions.
In addition the amendments clarify that service charges on an individual account may be netted against the interest only on that account.
Participation in IOLTA remains voluntary for financial institutions, but a lawyer may not keep an IOLTA account at a financial institution that does not participate or meet IOLTA requirements.
Documents Required. IOLTA forms currently on file for
existing accounts remain in effect. For
affected accounts, LTAB will work with banks
when additional forms or standard documents for higher rate products may
need to be signed. A new remittance form providing the required information regarding
account balances and interest and
dividend rates will be used; a number of banks are providing this information
already.
Brief
Explanation of Changes
Permits
the use of government money market funds for IOLTA accounts. The
rule authorizes the use of sweep
options for IOLTA accounts, where appropriate.
However, the use of sweep
options for IOLTA accounts is not required if the financial institution does
not offer sweep accounts to other
customers or the institution chooses to
simply pay the sweep or other applicable product rates (e.g., through
the use of tiered rates) on existing IOLTA
interest-bearing accounts instead of setting up sweep products for IOLTA accounts. Benefits of this approach may include
ease of administration and the option to
keep IOLTA funds on their bank's operations balance sheet. Due to minimum balance requirements, the sweep option is only
available to accounts identified by the eligible institution.
Defines institutions that may hold IOLTA funds as banks, savings and loan associations, or open-end investment companies that pay qualifying IOLTA accounts the highest interest rates generally available at their own institution to non-IOLTA customers with comparable balances.
More
clearly defines allowable fees which may be assessed against
the interest or dividends earned on an individual IOLTA account; any other fees
are the responsibility of the lawyer account holder. Fees which may be deducted from interest or dividends on an
IOLTA account include per check charges,
per deposit charges, a fee in lieu of a minimum balance, federal deposit insurance fees, sweep fees and a reasonable
administrative or maintenance fee. However, financial institutions
are encouraged to continue their practice which includes waiver of all fees on
IOLTA accounts to provide more funding for the IOLTA charitable purposes.
Lists
remittance information to be reported to LTAB and provides for a report to the lawyer or law firm in
accordance with normal procedures for reporting to depositors. In
addition to the account number, the information to be reported to LTAB (shown
on the revised IOLTA_Remittance Form) includes the name of the lawyer or law firm, the amount of the remittance
attributable to each account maintained by each lawyer or law firm, the rate and type of interest or dividends
applied, the amount of interest or
dividends earned, the amount and type of fees deducted, if any, and the average
account balance for the period for which the report is made.
MORE INFORMATION OR QUESTIONS: Call the Lawyer Trust Account Board at 651- 297-7800.